Prosecco scandal: Ex-company boss in court for 50,000 euros deal!

Prosecco scandal: Ex-company boss in court for 50,000 euros deal!

During the wine week, bizarre stories can quickly bloom, as the case of a former company leader shows that has come into the crossfire due to a controversial Prosecco purchase from Poland. According to Kurier it was about a purchase contract for two truck loads Prosecco and Spritz worth almost 50,000 euros, which he was without the knowledge and the consent of this Company boss is said to have completed.

The accused, who is now fighting with debt of 150,000 euros and can only partially pay alimony for his three children, speaks of a misunderstanding. He emphasizes that he only fulfilled his friendship with wine dealers by interconnecting "three to five pallets" as a friendship service in his schnapps distillery. Instead, however, he received two complete truck loads, which had to lead to a completely new storage space in Vienna-Seimering.

purchase contract and legal aspects

A purchase contract, such as Lagerwiki , is a corresponding declaration of intent between buyer and seller, in which both sides are obliged to provide certain services. In this case, it would be the seller who hands over the goods, and the buyer who pays for it and decreases the goods. The problem that has occurred here are the contradictory statements between the accused and the seller. The latter claims that there was a personal meeting in which all the takeover of the goods was clearly regulated.

The buyer can withdraw from a purchase contract if certain withdrawal conditions are met. A legally binding purchase contract, which can also be concluded orally, should still be recorded in writing in order to avoid misunderstandings. It is also described in the Civil Code (BGB), which regularly takes over the rules for purchase contracts in Germany and is also relevant for Austria in order to create a clear framework for both parties, such as Contract World

The judgment and the reactions

The situation escalated when the seller filed a complaint because the payments around the delivered goods that were originally supposed to be sent to the accused's address failed. While the judge released the accused in the first instance, the judgment is not yet final. The public prosecutor and the private participants have not yet commented on the case.

Both the accused and his defense lawyer doubt the authenticity of the allegations and suspect that the seller could spin a bankruptcy application against his own company. The whereabouts of the precaution and splash quantities he delivered remains unclear. For wine lovers and local retailers, this represents another disappointing chapter in the world of wine: "The goods are not to drink," says the wine dealer.

It remains to be seen whether the case takes other twists and how the level of awareness of the suspicious truck loads develops. What is certain is that everything in the wine trade is not as clear as it seems. So let's see what the next few weeks will bring and whether the correct storage and quality of wine will soon be discussed in Vienna.