Prosecco scandal: Ex-company boss in court over a 50,000 euro deal!

Prosecco scandal: Ex-company boss in court over a 50,000 euro deal!

Bizarre stories can quickly emerge during wine week, as shown by the case of a former company manager who was caught in the crossfire over a controversial purchase of Prosecco from Poland. Loud courier It was about a purchase contract for two truckloads of Prosecco and Spritzer worth almost 50,000 euros, which he is said to have concluded without the knowledge and consent of the then company boss.

The accused, who is now struggling with debts of 150,000 euros and can only partially pay alimony for his three children, speaks of a misunderstanding. He emphasizes that he was only honoring his wine dealer friendship by temporarily storing “three to five pallets” in his distillery as a friendly service. Instead, however, he received two complete truckloads, which had to lead to a completely new storage location in Vienna-Simmering.

Purchase contract and legal aspects

A sales contract, like Warehouse Wiki explained, is a mutual declaration of intent between buyer and seller in which both sides undertake to provide certain services. In this case, it would be the seller who hands over the goods and the buyer who pays for them and takes delivery of the goods. The problem that has arisen here is the contradictory statements between the accused and the seller. The latter claims that a personal meeting took place at which all acceptance of the goods was clearly regulated.

The buyer can withdraw from a purchase contract if certain withdrawal conditions are met. A legally binding purchase contract, which can also be concluded verbally, should still be recorded in writing to avoid misunderstandings. This is also how it is described in the Civil Code (BGB), which regularly adopts the rules for sales contracts in Germany and is also relevant for Austria in order to create a clear framework for both parties Contract world holds on.

The verdict and the reactions

The situation escalated when the seller filed a complaint because payments for the delivered goods, which were originally supposed to be sent to the defendant's address, had not been made. While the judge acquitted the defendant in the first instance, the verdict is not yet final. The public prosecutor's office and the representative of private parties have not yet commented on the case.

Both the accused and his defense attorney doubt the authenticity of the allegations and suspect that the seller could be preparing a bankruptcy petition against his own company. The whereabouts of the quantities of Prosecco and Spritzer he delivered remain unclear. For wine lovers and local traders, this represents another disappointing chapter in the world of wine: “The product is not drinkable,” says the wine dealer.

It remains to be seen whether the case will take further twists and how the level of awareness of the suspicious truckloads will develop. What is certain is that not everything in the wine trade is as clear as it seems. So let's see what the next few weeks will bring and whether the correct storage and quality of wine will soon be discussed again in Vienna.